Fewer links, more commentary than usual. Almost a regular post, but not quite. I'm mostly just going to focus on the latest debate(s) about the state of IR. I've come across a lot of other stuff worth commenting on since I last posted one of these, but I'm short on time, and only decided to post because I felt I needed to comment on the recent kerfuffle.
Saturday, March 24, 2012
This is the first in a semi-regular series on prominent applications of game theory to the study of international conflict.\(^1\) My goal is to clarify the main contribution of the piece. I'll do so first by offering a brief synopsis before going through the key claims in more detail. Along the way, I'll try to note some of the important implications and points of common confusion. Assuming that format makes sense to you all, I'll do the same with future articles.
We begin with what I consider to be the single most important contribution to the study of international conflict in the last 25 years: Fearon's Rationalist Explanations for War.
Tuesday, March 20, 2012
Friday, March 16, 2012
It's still going to be a while before I resume regular blogging. I want to get a few papers back under review first, and spring break was surprisingly less helpful in that regard than I'd hoped. But in the meantime, some links.